Upper Layer Fec for Dvb-sh: Technical Solutions and Performance

نویسنده

  • A. Morello
چکیده

A new system for hybrid satellite and terrestrial broadcasting of multimedia services to mobile handheld receivers has been recently standardised by DVB, namely DVB-SH. Direct mobile reception by S-band satellites is affected by obstacles (trees, buildings, bridges,..) blocking the Line-of-Sight (LoS) propagation, producing deep signal fading events lasting up-to several seconds or even more. To guarantee service continuity under such critical conditions, two approaches are defined by DVB-SH and, correspondingly, two classes of receivers are considered: Class 1 receivers support short fading protection at Physical Layer (PL), while long fading events are managed at the Upper Layer (UL); Class 2 receivers support long echo protection at physical layer, for a better exploitation of the PLFEC (Forward Error Correction) capability, at the expense of huge memory requirements (still challenging for cost effective hand-held devices). The standard adopts the 3GPP2 turbo code at the physical layer, together with a channel interleaver. The choice on the upper layer FEC is not yet taken, and conventional structures, such as an evolution of the MPE-FEC of the DVB-H standard, as well as more innovative solutions are currently proposed. The paper presents the system performance, in several DVB-SH scenarios and for different Upper Layer structures, then the results are compared to the corresponding Class 2 configurations. The long UL interleaving memories required to operate on mobile satellite channels may imply unacceptably long service switching times (zapping). Therefore a new method is proposed, allowing immediate zapping in any LoS propagation condition, and seamless transition to the steady state, where the full interleaving/ULFEC error protection is guaranteed.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

RFC 6683 Guidelines for DVB AL - FEC Protocol

Annex E of the Digital Video Broadcasting IPTV (DVB-IPTV) technical specification defines an optional Application-Layer Forward Error Correction (AL-FEC) protocol to protect the streaming media transported using RTP. The DVB-IPTV AL-FEC protocol uses two layers for FEC protection. The first (base) layer is based on the 1-D interleaved parity code. The second (enhancement) layer is based on the ...

متن کامل

RFC 6683 Guidelines for DVB AL - FEC Protocol August 2012

Annex E of the Digital Video Broadcasting IPTV (DVB-IPTV) technical specification defines an optional Application-Layer Forward Error Correction (AL-FEC) protocol to protect the streaming media transported using RTP. The DVB-IPTV AL-FEC protocol uses two layers for FEC protection. The first (base) layer is based on the 1-D interleaved parity code. The second (enhancement) layer is based on the ...

متن کامل

Combined Time, Frequency and Space Diversity in Multimedia Mobile Broadcasting Systems

The combined use of diversity in the time, frequency, and space domains constitutes a powerful instrument to improve the reception of mobile broadcasting services. The improvement brought by the utilization of diversity techniques can be translated into an extended coverage of mobile services, or into a reduction of the network infrastructure. This dissertation addresses the use of diversity fo...

متن کامل

MPE/ULE-FEC vs GSE-FEC Efficiency Comparison of IP Datagram Transmission Over DVB-S2

[Abstract] In this paper, the transport efficiency of Multi Protocol Encapsulation (MPE), Unidirectional Lightweight Encapsulation (ULE) and Generic Stream Encapsulation (GSE) for typical IP packet sizes is compared. Moreover, the aggregated efficiency when applying packet-level forward error correction (PL-FEC) with MPE, ULE and GSE is also analyzed. MPE-FEC is the mechanism used by DVB-H wher...

متن کامل

Innovative Space-Time-Space Block Code for Next Generation Handheld Systems

Broadcasting digital TV is currently an area of intensive development and standardisation activities. Actually, different groups are working on the standardisation problem. In Europe, the digital video broadcasting (DVB) consortium has adopted different standards for terrestrial (DVB-T) fixed reception, handheld (DVB-H) reception, satellite (DVB-S) reception as well as an hybrid reception like ...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2007